Post Publication Discussion
PIETAS: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Lintas Budaya (Journal of Religious and Cross-Cultural Studies) recognizes that scholarly communication continues beyond the publication of an article. The journal encourages constructive academic dialogue, critical engagement, and responsible discussion regarding published research.
Post-publication discussion allows authors, researchers, readers, and academic communities to provide scholarly feedback, raise questions, clarify interpretations, and contribute to the ongoing development of knowledge in religious studies and cross-cultural studies.
Purpose of Post-Publication Discussion
The purpose of post-publication discussion is to:
- Encourage scholarly exchange and critical dialogue among researchers;
- Provide opportunities for clarification, additional interpretation, or academic responses regarding published articles;
- Identify potential errors, limitations, or issues requiring editorial attention;
- Support transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in scholarly communication.
Forms of Post-Publication Discussion
Post-publication discussions may include:
- Scholarly correspondence or academic comments regarding published articles;
- Letters to the Editor containing constructive academic responses;
- Author responses or clarifications related to published research;
- Academic discussions presented through appropriate scholarly platforms; and
- Notifications regarding possible errors, ethical concerns, or issues affecting the integrity of published work.
Submission of Comments and Concerns
Readers, researchers, and other interested parties may submit comments, questions, or concerns regarding published articles by contacting the Editorial Office of PIETAS.
Submissions should:
- Clearly identify the article being discussed, including title, author(s), and publication details;
- Present objective, evidence-based, and academically relevant arguments;
- Avoid personal attacks, discriminatory statements, or inappropriate criticism; and
- Contribute to constructive scholarly discussion.
Editorial Evaluation of Post-Publication Issues
The Editorial Team evaluates post-publication comments and concerns to determine the appropriate response.
Depending on the nature of the issue, PIETAS may:
- Publish a scholarly response or Letter to the Editor;
- Invite authors to provide clarification or a formal response;
- Publish additional editorial notes or updates;
- Initiate further investigation when concerns relate to research integrity or publication ethics; or
- Apply correction, expression of concern, or retraction procedures when necessary.
Standards for Academic Discussion
PIETAS promotes respectful, evidence-based, and inclusive scholarly discussion.
Because the journal publishes research related to religion, culture, identity, and communities, post-publication discussions must respect intellectual diversity, cultural sensitivity, religious diversity, and academic freedom while maintaining scholarly standards.
Author Response
Authors may be invited to respond to substantive comments or concerns regarding their published work. Author responses should address academic issues objectively and contribute to transparent scholarly communication.
Protection of Scholarly Integrity
Post-publication discussions that identify potential errors, ethical concerns, or research integrity issues will be handled according to PIETAS Publication Ethics, Research Misconduct Policy, and Correction and Retraction Policy.
PIETAS is committed to maintaining an open, transparent, and responsible scholarly record by encouraging meaningful academic dialogue after publication.
