Liberation Theology and Structural Poverty: A Conceptual Analysis of Gustavo Gutiérrez and Ali Shariati's Thought

Authors

  • Rini Sumanti Sapalakkai country Korea, Republic of Hoseo University, Asan, Chungcheongnam-do Author
  • Mohd Kasturi Nor Abd Aziz country Malaysia Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau Author
  • Yunardi Kristian Zega ✉ country Indonesia Politeknik Negeri Kupang, Kupang Author
  • Talizaro Tafonao country Indonesia Institut Agama Kristen REAL Batam, Batam Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62282/pj.v4i1.38-50

Keywords:

Ali Shariati, comparative theology, Gustavo Gutiérrez, liberation theology, structural poverty

Abstract

Liberation theology has produced influential critiques of structural injustice across civilizations, yet comparative scholarship connecting Catholic and Islamic liberation thought remains limited. This study compares the theological frameworks of Gustavo Gutiérrez, a founding figure of Latin American liberation theology, and Ali Shariati, an Iranian Islamic thinker, with attention to their conceptualizations of structural poverty and social justice. Using a qualitative comparative textual study and conceptual analysis guided by contextual hermeneutics, the study analyzes their principal works and a screened body of secondary literature through a codebook of seven analytical dimensions. The results show functional-ethical convergence: both thinkers treat religion as an emancipatory force, prioritize praxis, criticize institutional complicity in poverty, and emphasize the agency of the oppressed. They diverge in ontological premises (Christology versus Tawhid), epistemological sources, and political vision. The study contributes a conceptual synthesis and an integrative model that links a shared understanding of social justice to coordinated responses to structural poverty, moderated by national context. The model is offered as a conceptual proposition for Southeast Asia and requires empirical testing. The findings support interfaith discourse on religion-based social justice while preserving the doctrinal differences between the two traditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahamian, E. (1982). Iran between two revolutions. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691191522

Asian Development Bank. (2023). Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2023. Asian Development Bank.

Bayat, A. (2007). Making Islam democratic: Social movements and the post-Islamist turn. Stanford University Press.

Berryman, P. (1987). Liberation theology: Essential facts about the revolutionary movement in Latin America and beyond. Pantheon Books.

Boff, L. (1986). Ecclesiogenesis: The base communities reinvent the church (R. R. Barr, Trans.). Orbis Books.

Burhani, A. N. (2013). Liberal and progressive voices in Muhammadiyah. Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs, 47(2), 73–94.

Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America (M. M. Urquidi, Trans.). University of California Press.

Clooney, F. X. (2010). Comparative theology: Deep learning across religious borders. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318951

Cornelio, J. S. (2016). Being Catholic in the contemporary Philippines: Young people reinterpreting religion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657264

Dabashi, H. (2008). Islamic liberation theology: Resisting the empire. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927359

Ellacuría, I., & Sobrino, J. (Eds.). (1993). Mysterium liberationis: Fundamental concepts of liberation theology. Orbis Books.

Engineer, A. A. (2001). Islam and liberation theology: Essays on liberative elements in Islam. Sterling Publishers.

Esack, F. (1997). Qur'an, liberation and pluralism: An Islamic perspective of interreligious solidarity against oppression. Oneworld Publications.

Farmer, P. (2004). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520931473

Francis. (2013). Evangelii gaudium [Apostolic exhortation]. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. Monthly Review Press.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder.

Gaspar, K. M. (2010). The Lumad's struggle in the face of globalization. Alternate Forum for Research in Mindanao.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

Gutiérrez, G. (1983). The power of the poor in history: Selected writings (R. R. Barr, Trans.). Orbis Books.

Gutiérrez, G. (1988). A theology of liberation: History, politics, and salvation (Rev. ed.; C. Inda & J. Eagleson, Trans.). Orbis Books. (Original work published 1973)

Hefner, R. W. (2021). Islam and institutional religious freedom in Indonesia. Religions, 12(6), Article 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060415

Hennelly, A. T. (Ed.). (1990). Liberation theology: A documentary history. Orbis Books.

John Paul II. (1987). Sollicitudo rei socialis [Encyclical letter]. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Knitter, P. F. (2013). Without Buddha I could not be a Christian. Oneworld Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Marx, K. (1970). Critique of Hegel's philosophy of right (A. Jolin & J. O'Malley, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1844)

Metz, J. B. (1980). Faith in history and society: Toward a practical fundamental theology (D. Smith, Trans.). Seabury Press.

Novak, M. (1986). Will it liberate? Questions about liberation theology. Paulist Press.

Pieris, A. (1988). An Asian theology of liberation. T&T Clark.

Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Rahnema, A. (2000). An Islamic utopian: A political biography of Ali Shari'ati. I.B. Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755610822

Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action, and interpretation (J. B. Thompson, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534984

Rowland, C. (Ed.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to liberation theology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521868831

Sachedina, A. A. (2001). The Islamic roots of democratic pluralism. Oxford University Press.

Segundo, J. L. (1976). The liberation of theology (J. Drury, Trans.). Orbis Books.

Shariati, A. (1981). Fatima is Fatima (L. Bakhtiar, Trans.). Shariati Foundation. (Original work published 1971)

Shariati, A. (1986a). On the sociology of Islam (H. Algar, Trans.). Mizan Press. (Original work published 1979)

Shariati, A. (1986b). What is to be done: The enlightened thinkers and an Islamic renaissance (F. Rajaee, Ed.). Institute for Research and Islamic Studies.

Shariati, A. (2003). Religion vs. religion (L. Bakhtiar, Trans.). ABC International Group.

Sobrino, J. (1993). Jesus the liberator: A historical-theological reading of Jesus of Nazareth (P. Burns & F. McDonagh, Trans.). Orbis Books.

Tracy, D. (1987). Plurality and ambiguity: Hermeneutics, religion, hope. University of Chicago Press.

World Bank. (2022). Poverty and shared prosperity 2022: Correcting course. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1893-6

Zubaida, S. (2011). Beyond Islam: A new understanding of the Middle East. I.B. Tauris.

Downloads

Published

2026-12-15

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): December (Article in Progress)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Rini Sumanti Sapalakkai, Mohd Kasturi Nor Abd Aziz, Yunardi Kristian Zega, Talizaro Tafonao (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

License Terms

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Users are free to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and reuse the published articles for any lawful purpose, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), the article title, the journal name, and the original publication source.

Authors retain copyright of their articles published in PIETAS: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Lintas Budaya.

Any reuse, adaptation, or redistribution of published materials must comply with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License and applicable copyright regulations.